1.it seems to me that one of the problems with the form of general and indeed other elections in britain is that they mystify and create abstractions.whilst saphologists(?) think that they can attribute purpose to the electorates voting intentions i don't really accept this.i think its similar to the mystification of markets and indeed the whole economy where intent and purpose is explained as the hand of god or the hidden hand that in the case of the former does no good for any god of theology either.
2.that all said,when the result came in that we had a hung parliament,with no easily established majority,i began articulating the view tat it represented a "plague on all your houses"outlook of the electorate.i am of course aware that the view expressed here in (1)and(2)do not fit easily together.
3.the parties,particularly the dominant 3-tories/conservative,labour(ne labour)and lib.dems(liberal democrats-conducted a psychological dance with each other which led after a weekend to the announcement of a con.dem(conservative and liberal)coalition,with in my opinion no mandate,certainly no clear mandate for anything.i found myself suggesting that this meant they would or at least could be subject to endless,unrelenting criticism from evryone and anyone on a grand and permanent scale that might look like a huge ongoig satirical adventure-though i do not mean to imply it would be pleasurable.in making the "best of a bad job" this might offer brilliant opportunities for the left to educate,agitate and organise.
4.what i failed to pay adequate attention to is the lack of an adequate left able to grow such opportunities of adequate political weight to be an alternative pole of attraction to act as memory and educator of "the class"(the working class)and other social forces able to create any kind of "better world".
5.what i do not mean here is that the class needs educating from outside by a professional elite of full-time revolutionaries,nor that we have collective amnesia.
6.what we certainly need is a counter-balance to the ideas,ideology and culture of the dominant social classes alongside the eans to generalise and develop and widen the impact of alternative ideas and experience of the working class to equip ourselves to not just fight back but to win the better world we deserve.
7.i do not have a detailed blue print for that world we have to win,but that same realistraion should not liit our efforts to build something better in the here and now.we cannot postpone this to a distant or indeed and immediate future.we have to lay the seeds and build now.means and ends are both important.to fail to engage in tyhe endeavour of understanding and changing the world,does not simply postpone the future but it makes it into the "pie in the sky"that joe hill(of the IWW)and the marxists both attribute to theology.
8....to be continued...
lost,
15/03/2011
2.that all said,when the result came in that we had a hung parliament,with no easily established majority,i began articulating the view tat it represented a "plague on all your houses"outlook of the electorate.i am of course aware that the view expressed here in (1)and(2)do not fit easily together.
3.the parties,particularly the dominant 3-tories/conservative,labour(ne labour)and lib.dems(liberal democrats-conducted a psychological dance with each other which led after a weekend to the announcement of a con.dem(conservative and liberal)coalition,with in my opinion no mandate,certainly no clear mandate for anything.i found myself suggesting that this meant they would or at least could be subject to endless,unrelenting criticism from evryone and anyone on a grand and permanent scale that might look like a huge ongoig satirical adventure-though i do not mean to imply it would be pleasurable.in making the "best of a bad job" this might offer brilliant opportunities for the left to educate,agitate and organise.
4.what i failed to pay adequate attention to is the lack of an adequate left able to grow such opportunities of adequate political weight to be an alternative pole of attraction to act as memory and educator of "the class"(the working class)and other social forces able to create any kind of "better world".
5.what i do not mean here is that the class needs educating from outside by a professional elite of full-time revolutionaries,nor that we have collective amnesia.
6.what we certainly need is a counter-balance to the ideas,ideology and culture of the dominant social classes alongside the eans to generalise and develop and widen the impact of alternative ideas and experience of the working class to equip ourselves to not just fight back but to win the better world we deserve.
7.i do not have a detailed blue print for that world we have to win,but that same realistraion should not liit our efforts to build something better in the here and now.we cannot postpone this to a distant or indeed and immediate future.we have to lay the seeds and build now.means and ends are both important.to fail to engage in tyhe endeavour of understanding and changing the world,does not simply postpone the future but it makes it into the "pie in the sky"that joe hill(of the IWW)and the marxists both attribute to theology.
8....to be continued...
lost,
15/03/2011
Sun Jun 02, 2019 3:20 am by luxemburguista
» Frente Anticapitalista Verde: Manifiesto - Green Anti-Capitalist Front: Manifesto
Sat Jun 01, 2019 11:11 am by luxemburguista
» Las ideologías identitarias: La trampa de la diversidad
Wed May 29, 2019 11:44 am by luxemburguista
» 1 de Mayo: Viva la lucha de la clase obrera
Sun Apr 28, 2019 3:47 am by luxemburguista
» Campaña de la CGT contra la ley de mutuas
Sun Apr 28, 2019 3:40 am by luxemburguista
» Rosa Luxemburg: la llama ardiente de la revolución
Tue Mar 26, 2019 12:46 pm by luxemburguista
» Al fascismo no se le combate votando
Sat Mar 23, 2019 2:22 am by luxemburguista
» A Green New Deal vs. Revolutionary Ecosocialism
Sat Mar 09, 2019 4:33 am by luxemburguista
» La era del pánico climático está aquí
Sat Mar 02, 2019 5:44 am by luxemburguista